Evidently, we owe our existence to the presence of a smallish planet orbiting a medium size sun in a named galaxy, the Milky Way, existing among many billions of unnamed counterparts. But that knowledge isn’t sufficient for us to recognise ourselves or place the universe in existence. Indeed, the sheer insurmountability of the problem has encouraged us to adopt an alternative approach, by acknowledging that everything exists ‘in nature’, which we identify as the ‘all encompassing fact of existence’ – as if we can become familiar with the bigger picture by generalising from the details.
However, this introduces another problem. Whereas everything in existence can be represented as a feature of a micro reality, sometimes called the atomic flux, that’s not where we find the reality of things that transpire. In short, we are alive and dynamic in a different way. Nevertheless we presume to gain explanatory depth by tracing our existence back to causes operating at successively lower levels – and our ‘findings’ are taken to be all the more robust when there is nothing else to be found. But the upshot is not realistic, namely that the atoms are living our lives for us. Something else is happening. Something else exists that can’t be found at that level.
So the observation that there must be somewhere for existence ‘to be’ doesn’t prove that everything condenses into its causes in a ‘first place’ – even when there is nothing else to see at that point. And this paradoxical fact carries on up the scale to include the fact of our thinking – seen as located in the brain ‘because there is nowhere else for it to be’. But we could ‘see’ our thoughts long before we sought to ‘find’ them objectively. And our scientific explanations are as much the result of our thinking. Therefore, the ‘discovery’ that the brain is thinking for us doesn’t do justice to our awareness of the fact or the place of sentience within the very real phenomena of change. In fact, only a misplaced awareness would deem to identify itself as a mere superficiality that makes no real difference.
Links: ‘Mindless Replicants’: A ‘Point of View’ by Will Self:
‘Science Stories’: The ‘uncanny valley’ of AI: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b06vy2jd/episodes/downloads