How does being come to be?

Does a physical ‘everything’ evolve

from a bedrock of causality 

– being, in effect, the cause of itself

and the character of change

– to the shape of its burgeoning personality?

Let’s call a thought a different form of the physical.

Does that explain the difference?

Call it a physical process

– does it mean the process knows what it is doing

in order to think

– so to identify itself?

Mike Laidler

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.